LPIS Home Page
Google Search

Title: DLEJena: A Practical Forward-Chaining OWL 2 RL Reasoner Combining Jena and Pellet
Author(s): G. Meditskos, N. Bassiliades.
Availability: Click here to download the PDF (Acrobat Reader) file (12 pages).
Keywords:
Appeared in: Journal of Web Semantics, Elsevier, 8(1), pp. 89-94, 2010.
Abstract: This paper describes DLEJena, a practical reasoner for the OWL 2 RL profile that combines the forward-chaining rule engine of Jena and the Pellet DL reasoner. This combination is based on rule templates, instantiating at run-time a set of ABox OWL 2 RL/RDF Jena rules dedicated to a particular TBox that is handled by Pellet. The goal of DLEJena is to handle efficiently, through instantiated rules, the OWL 2 RL ontologies under direct semantics, where classes and properties cannot be at the same time individuals. The TBox semantics are treated by Pellet, reusing in that way efficient and sophisticated TBox DL reasoning algorithms. The experimental evaluation shows that DLEJena achieves more scalable ABox reasoning than the direct implementation of the OWL 2 RL/RDF rule set in the Jena's production rule engine, which is the main target of the system. DLEJena can be also used as a generic framework for applying an arbitrary number of entailments beyond the OWL 2 RL profile.
See also :


        This paper has been cited by the following:

1 Hogan, A., Pan, J.Z., Polleres, A., Decker, S., “SAOR: Template rule optimisations for distributed reasoning over 1 billion linked data triples”, 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010; Shanghai; 7-11 Nov. 2010, 6496 LNCS (PART 1), pp. 337-353.
2 Aidan Hogan, Andreas Harth, Juergen Umbrich, Sheila Kinsella, Axel Polleres, Stefan Decker, "Searching And Browsing Linked Data With SWSE: The Semantic Web Search Engine", DERI Technical Report 2010-07-23, July 2010.
3 Aidan Hogan, Andreas Harth, Jurgen Umbrich, Sheila Kinsella, Axel Polleres, Stefan Decker, Searching and browsing Linked Data with SWSE: The Semantic Web Search Engine, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, Volume 9, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages 365-401, ISSN 1570-8268, 10.1016/j.websem.2011.06.004.
4 Hui Shi, “Adaptive Reasoning for ScienceWeb”, Literature Review and Dissertation Research Proposal, Department of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, USA, May 2011.
5 Aidan Hogan, Jeff Z. Pan, Axel Polleres and Yuan Ren. "Scalable OWL 2 Reasoning for Linked Data", (2011), 7th Int. Summer School 2011 on Reasoning Web: Semantic Technologies for the Web of Data; Galway; 23-27 Aug, LNCS6848, Springer, pp. 250-325.
6 Hogan, A., “Integrating linked data through RDFS and OWL: Some lessons learnt”, (2011) Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6902 LNCS, pp. 250-256.
7 Christian Seitz and Rene Schonfelder, “Rule-based OWL Reasoning for specific Embedded Devices”, 10th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-2011), Semantic Web in Use Track, October 23-27, 2011, Bonn, Germany.
8 Tai, Wei; Keeney, John; O'Sullivan, Declan; , "RESP: A Computer Aided OWL REasoner Selection Process," Semantic Computing (ICSC), 2011 Fifth IEEE International Conference on , vol., no., pp.27-34, 18-21 Sept. 2011
9 Hui Shi, “Adaptive Reasoning for Semantic Queries”, White Paper, Department of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, USA, May 2011.
10 Consortium of Collaborative Project ASTUTE-Pro-Active decision support for data-intensive environments, Deliverable D2.2 – Survey of state of the art enabling technologies and associated gap analysis w.r.t ASTUTE objectives, Artemis Joint Undertaking, ASP8, Human-centric design of embedded systems, 14-09-2011, available at: http://www-dsp.elet.polimi.it/ispg/ASTUTE/D2.2_final.docx
11 Pieter-Jan Huyghe, “Chaining-based reasoning in multi-sensor smart homes”, MSc Thesis, Hogeschool West-Vlaanderen, Master Industriele Wetenschappen: Electronica-ICT, Netherlands, June 2012.
12 Martin O'Connor and Amar Das, “A Pair of OWL 2 RL Reasoners”, 9th OWL: Experiences and Directions Workshop (OWLED 2012), Heraklion, Crete, 27th-28th May, 2012.
13 Bouaicha, S., Boufaida, Z., “Extending SWRL rules for rules/concepts integration in hybrid ontologies”, (2012) 2nd International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology, INTECH 2012, art. no. 6457763, pp. 240-246.
14 Aidan Hogan, Antoine Zimmermann, Jurgen Umbrich, Axel Polleres, Stefan Decker, Scalable and Distributed Methods for Entity Matching, Consolidation and Disambiguation over Linked Data Corpora, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 10, pp. 76-110, Jan 2012.
15 Andreas Harth, Aidan Hogan, Juergen Umbrich, Sheila Kinsella, Axel Polleres, and Stefan Decker, “Searching and Browsing Linked Data with SWSE”, R. De Virgilio et al. (eds.), Semantic Search over the Web, Chapter 14, Data-Centric Systems and Applications, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-25008-8 14, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012, pp. 361-414.
16 Birte Glimm, Aidan Hogan, Markus Krotzsch, Axel Polleres, "OWL: Yet to arrive on the Web of Data?", Linked Data on the Web (LDOW2012), WWW2012 Workshop, 16 April, 2012, France
17 Seung Woo Lee, Han Min Jung, Mi Kyoung Lee, Jae Han Kim, Beom Jong You, Pyung Kim, “Rule reasoner, and dynamic materialization method for wild pattern rules including the same”, US Patent, 8346707 B2, published 1/1/2013.
18 Ashraf, Jamshaid, “A semantic framework for ontology usage analysis”, PhD Thesis, Curtin University, School of Information Systems, Curtin Business School, Australia, February 2013.
19 Rokan Uddin Faruqui, Wendy MacCaull, “OwlOntDB: A Scalable Reasoning System for OWL 2 RL Ontologies with Large ABoxes”, Foundations of Health Information Engineering and Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 7789, Springer, 2013, pp 105-123.
20 Souad Bouaicha, Zizette Boufaida, “Reasoning on Hybrid Ontology Using Extended SWRL Rules”, Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, Vol 6, No 1 (2014), pp. 3-8, Feb 2014.
21 J Bąk, M Nowak, C Jędrzejak, “Rule-based reasoning with OWL 2 RL ontologies”, Studia Informatica, Vol 35, No 2, 2014, pp. 111-125.
22 Thibaut Tiberghien, “Strategies for Context Reasoning in Assistive Livings for the Elderly”, PhD Thesis, Institut Mines-Telecom & University Pierre and Marie Curie, Specialization in Computer Sciences, Paris Doctoral School of Computing, Telecommunication and Electronics, France, November 2013
23 Wenge Rong; Rifan Li; Hao Sheng; Yuanxin Ouyang; Zhang Xiong, "Combination of DM and OBDA for Ontology Generation from Relational Database," Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing (DASC), 2013 IEEE 11th International Conference on , vol., no., pp.386,393, 21-22 Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1109/DASC.2013.94
24 Nakamura, L.H.V.; do Prado, P.F.; de O Libardi, R.M.; Nunes, L.H.; Estrella, J.C.; Santana, R.H.C.; Santana, M.J.; Reiff-Marganiec, S., "Fast Selection of Web Services with QoS Using a Distributed Parallel Semantic Approach," Web Services (ICWS), 2014 IEEE International Conference on , vol., no., pp.680,681, June 27 2014-July 2 2014
25 Ting, M., Kadir, R.A., Mohd Tengku Sembok, T., Ahmad, F., Azman, A., “Feasibility study concerning the use of reasoning technique in semantic reasoners”, (2014) LNCS 8870, pp. 371-381.
26 Yu, Chih-Hao (2014). Semantic annotation services for 3D models of cultural heritage artefacts PhD Thesis, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Australia. doi:10.14264/uql.2014.617
27 Xiaoming Zhang, Pengtao Lv and Jianxia Wang, “STSM: An Infrastructure for Unifying Steel Knowledge and Discovering New Knowledge“, International Journal of Database Theory and Applica-tion, Vol.7, No.6 (2014), pp.175-190.
28 Jaroslaw Bak, Czeslaw Jedrzejek, “Rule-Based Reasoning System for OWL 2 RL Ontologies”, Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 8733, 2014, pp 404-413
29 Wei Tai, John Keeney, Declan O'Sullivan, “Resource-Constrained Reasoning Using a Reasoner Compo-sition Approach”, Semantic Web journal, 6(1), pp. 35-59, 2015. Available at: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/resource-constrained-reasoning-using-reasoner-composition-approach-0


MLKD Home ISKP Home