LPIS Home Page
Google Search

Title: An Empirical Study Of Multi-Label Learning Methods For Video Annotation
Author(s): A. Dimou, G. Tsoumakas, V. Mezaris, I. Kompatsiaris, I. Vlahavas.
Availability: Click here to download the PDF (Acrobat Reader) file (6 pages).
Keywords:
Appeared in: 7th International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing, IEEE, Chania, Crete, 2009.
Abstract: This paper presents an experimental comparison of different approaches to learning from multi-labeled video data. We compare state-of-the-art multi-label learning methods on the Mediamill Challenge dataset. We employ MPEG-7 and SIFT-based global image descriptors independently and in conjunction using variations of the stacking approach for their fusion. We evaluate the results comparing the different classifiers using both MPEG-7 and SIFT-based descriptors and their fusion. A variety of multi-label evaluation measures is used to explore advantages and disadvantages of the examined classifiers. Results give rise to interesting conclusions.
See also :


        This paper has been cited by the following:

1 M. Antenreiter, R. Ortner, and P. Auer, “Combining Classifiers for Improved Multilabel Image Classification”, Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD 2009 Workshop on Learning from Multi-Label Data (MLD’09), pp. 16-27, Bled, Slovenia, September 2009.
2 Huo,Y. (2010) Multi-label image categorization for general concepts using bag of words model, MSc Thesis, Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science
3 Nasierding, G., Kouzani, A.Z. (2010) "Empirical Study of Multi-label Classification Methods for Image Annotation and Retrieval," dicta, pp.617-622, 2010 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications.
4 Gold, K., Petrosino, A. (2010) Using Information Gain to Build Meaningful Decision Forests for Multilabel Classification. To be presented at ICDL 2010, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
5 Lin, X., Chen, X.-W. (2010) Mr.KNN: soft relevance for multi-label classification. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (CIKM '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 349-358.
6 Heath, D., Zitzelberger, A., Giraud-Carrier, C.G. (2010) A Multiple Domain Comparison of Multi-label Classification Methods, Proc 2nd International Workshop on Learning from Multi-Label Data.
7 Muhammad Tahir, Josef Kittler, Krystian Mikolajczyk, and Fei Yan. "Improving multilabel classification performance by using ensemble of multi-label classifiers". In Neamat Gayar, Josef Kittler, and Fabio Roli, editors, Multiple Classifier Systems, volume 5997, chapter 2, pages 11–21. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.
8 Read, J., Pfahringer, B., Holmes, G., Frank, E. (2011) Classifier chains for multi-label classification, Machine Learning, 85 (3), pp. 333-359.
9 Valentini, G. (2011) True path rule hierarchical ensembles for genome-wide gene function prediction, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 8 (3), art. no. 5467036, pp. 832-847
10 Chen,Y.-T. (2012) A Study on Interactive Video-based Learning System for Learning Courseware, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 4(20): 4132-4137, 2012
11 Briggs,F.;Lakshminarayanan,B.;Neal,L.;Fern,X.Z.;Raich,R.;Hadley,S.J.K.;Hadley,A.S.;Betts,M.G. (2012) Acoustic classification of multiple simultaneous bird species: A multi-instance multi-label approach, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 4640.
12 Cesa-Bianchi, N., Re, M., Valentini, G. (2012) Synergy of multi-label hierarchical ensembles, data fusion, and cost-sensitive methods for gene functional inference, Machine Learning, 88 (1-2), pp. 209-241.
13 Wicker, J., Pfahringer, B., Kramer, S. (2012) Multi-label classification using boolean matrix decomposition, Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 179-186.
14 Zhu, Y., Luo, W., Chen, G., Ou, J. (2012) A multi-label classification method based on associative rules, Journal of Computational Information Systems, 8 (2), pp. 791-799.
15 Chen, Y.-T. (2012) The effect of thematic video-based instruction on learning and motivation in e-learning, International Journal of Physical Sciences, 7 (6), pp. 957-965.


MLKD Home ISKP Home