LPIS Home Page
Google Search

Title: Rule-based OWL Reasoning Systems: Implementations, Strengths and Weaknesses
Author(s): G. Meditskos, N. Bassiliades.
Availability: Click here to download the PDF (Acrobat Reader) file.
Keywords: ontologies and rules, OWL, reasoning.
Appeared in: Handbook of Research on Emerging Rule-Based Languages and Technologies: Open Solutions and Approaches, Adrian Giurca, Dragan Gasevic, Kuldar Taveter (Ed.), IGI Global, ISBN 978-1-60566-402-6, pp. 124-148, 2009.
Abstract: This chapter is focused on the basic principles behind the utilization of rules in order to perform reasoning about the Web Ontology Language (OWL), a Description Logic-based language that is the W3C recommendation for creating and sharing ontologies in the Semantic Web. More precisely, we elaborate on the entailment-based OWL reasoning (EBOR) paradigm, which is based on the utilization of RDF/RDFS and OWL entailment rules that run on a rule engine, applying the formal semantics of the ontology language. To this end, seven EBOR systems are described and compared, analyzing the different approaches. Despite the closed rule environment, which comes in contrast with the open nature of the Semantic Web, and the fact that OWL semantics are partially mapped into rules, the rule-based OWL reasoning paradigm can give great potentials in the Semantic Web, enabling the utilization of rule engines on top of ontology information.
See also :

        This paper has been cited by the following:

1 Jos de Bruijn, Philippe Bonnard, Hugues Citeau, Sylvain Dehors, Stijn Heymans, Roman Korf, Jorg Puhrer, Thomas Eiter, “State-of-the-art survey of issues”, Deliverable D3.1, ONTORULE, EU-IST Integrated Project (IP) 2009-231875, April 30, 2009.
2 Naeem Khalid Janjua, Farookh Khadeer Hussain, "Development of a Logic Layer in the Semantic Web: Research Issues", Sixth International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids, pp.367-370, 2010
3 Jidi Zhao, "Uncertainty and Rule Extensions to Description Logics and Semantic Web Ontologies", in Advances in Semantic Computing, (Eds. Joshi, Boley and Akerkar), Vol. 2, Chapter 1, ISBN 978-81-908426-1-7, pp 1 – 22, 2010.
4 Hu Y.-J., Wu W.-N., Cheng K.-P., Huang Y.-L. Semantic Legal Policies for Data Exchange and Protection across Super-Peer Domains in the Cloud. Future Internet. 2012; 4(4):929-954.
5 Naeem Khalid Janjua, A Defeasible Logic Programming-Based Framework to Support Argumentation in Semantic Web Applications, Springer Theses, ISBN 978-3-319-03948-0, 2014.